White gay sex

Apr 07, Simon Vandereecken rated it it was amazing Shelves: Thanks to Netgalley for giving me a chance to review this essay! Not Gay is a deep and well documented study on white straight male sexuality and general behavior. It shows the tendencies of a certain part of the white straight male population to have homosexual behavior under certain conditions. It takes a bold stance concerning the fluidity of the sexuality and its evolution especially nowadays while having a look on how the roles and gender evolved through the last century.

This essay is rea Thanks to Netgalley for giving me a chance to review this essay! This essay is really interesting, quite deep and demands to be focused on its reading especially due to the multiple use of queer terms and gender-theory related terms , but teaches a lot on things related to the straight white male sexuality through the hazing rituals, the marine and military initations, drunk sex, craiglist ads of straight dude looking for other straight dudes It shows also how gender and sexuality evolved, with the apparition of the heteroflexible sexuality neither gay, bi or totally straight , and explains how those straight homosexual relations can be interpreted but also what they imply.

The whole book was really interesting, challenging my mind at every part. It made me discover some things I really didn't know like the fact that until , both heterosexuality and homosexuality were considered as perversion as they didn't aim for conception and surprised me on a lot of subjects male rituals, "on the down low" sex, For everyone interested in gender and human sexuality, this is quite an essay to read! Oct 25, Gaetano Venezia rated it really liked it. People certainly have tendencies toward particular objects of desire, including bodies defined in the time and place as "the same" or "the opposite" from their own.

And yet, for the vast majority of us, these tendencies—whatever they may be—are shaped and experienced under the constraints of heteronormativity, within cultures strongly invested in opposite-sex coupling. The amount of psychic and cultural labor expended to produce and enforce heterosexual identification and procreative sexuality suggests that heterosexuality, as we now know it, is hardly an automatic human effect.

It is for this reason that scholars of heterosexuality have described it as a psychic and social accomplishment, an institution, and a cultural formation" By creating a "normal" sexuality and identity, all other desires, identities, and preferences get marginalized and moralized against.

• scene in gay dating apps means?
• Wonky Wednesday: Racism in Gay Online Dating.
• dating guy who might be gay?
• Not Gay: Sex Between Straight White Men.
• chicago gay escort reviews?
• gay hunt dating?

Understandably then, many people will feel constrained and unfulfilled in their relationships because they are following a script that does not align with their genetic predispositions and developed preferences. The meat of the book is then a historical analysis of sex between straight white men with application of the concepts and ideas found in the introduction.

Why Do the Oscars Keep Falling for Racial Reconciliation Fantasies?

Not only is this a political loss, to the extent that potential queer radicals are being absorbed into the machinery of equality and sameness, but it also misrecognizes queerness, as narratives about love, biology, and immutability are projected onto people, like [Ward], who enrolled themselves in queer subculture in order to escape the sexism and boredom of heterosexuality" However, to clarify, Ward is "not actually proposing we take a stand against gay love in and of itself, but that we take a stand against the forces attempting to erase queerness and reduce all non-straight homosexuality to romantic, couple-centered love" Ward speaking about what is "unfathomable to most people" and the heteronormative narrative: Aug 02, Travis Hay rated it did not like it.

I've seen several articles about this book, and wanted to hold my opinion until I've read the book myself. I'm glad I did. Did Jane Ward do any research into sexuality at all before writing this book? She's impressively narrow-minded in writing this book. It's been long accepted that sexuality exists on a spectrum, since Kinsey's writings on the Kinsey scale in There's a lot of controversy regarding Dr.

Kinsey's work, but the spectrum of sexuality is well accepted as an accurate assessment o I've seen several articles about this book, and wanted to hold my opinion until I've read the book myself. Kinsey's work, but the spectrum of sexuality is well accepted as an accurate assessment of human sexuality. What Jane Ward has chosen to do, is conveniently ignoring every single identity between heterosexual, and homosexual, in order to make her point.

I'm not entirely sure what her point was, but after reading this pile of drite, I can only assume it was to make heterosexual men look bad? One of the accepted facts about sexuality existing on a scale is that the scale itself isn't rigid. That you can be 'exclusively homosexuality' but have still had experience with persons of the opposite gender in the past, is an accepted existence, or else the term 'gold star gay' wouldn't exist. The same exists on the opposite end of the scale, where a straight human can still have sexual playtime with someone of the same gender, while still retaining their sexual identity.

Where I live, the term sexual preference is outdated, and instead we use sexual identity, or orientation, because our sexuality exists as we identify it. That's why you have people who are happily married 'realizing' they're gay later in life, because their identity has shifted. Jane Ward is clearly not as credible as she pretends to be, is far more pretentious than she clearly thinks, and frankly extremely, and embarrassingly, uneducated in her findings with this book. View 1 comment. Aug 10, Sineala rated it liked it Shelves: I was looking forward to reading this after reading an interview and seeing the author's thought-provoking answer to the question of whether homosexuality was innate; while the chapter on queerness-by-choice was in fact pretty great, the rest of the book didn't really live up to that.

List of gay, lesbian or bisexual people: W–Z

She made some interesting points but the entire book was really deeply repetitive, to the point where it felt like she was literally using the same sentences she used in the introduction, and that kind of made the I was looking forward to reading this after reading an interview and seeing the author's thought-provoking answer to the question of whether homosexuality was innate; while the chapter on queerness-by-choice was in fact pretty great, the rest of the book didn't really live up to that.

She made some interesting points but the entire book was really deeply repetitive, to the point where it felt like she was literally using the same sentences she used in the introduction, and that kind of made the whole thing a slog, unfortunately. Also some of the analysis seemed a little shaky: There was a chapter on men who wanted to sleep with straight men and posted ads on Craigslist Plus, man, I don't know what kind of fuck-or-die fanfic Ward was reading in order to analogize it to situational homosexuality but in the genre these days I am pretty sure the characters generally don't identify as straight or if they do, they don't by the end.

Could just be my reading experience though. An interesting read, but if you've read the introduction, you've basically read the book, minus the screenshots of gay-for-pay porn that show up in the later chapters. Sep 14, ralowe rated it really liked it. A rather funny wordplay on crazy stuff.

Wonky Wednesday: Racism in Gay Online Dating - National LGBTQ Task Force

Here goes a bit of tongue-in-the-cheek: Also a bit of word-twisting: Apr 22, Rambling Reader rated it really liked it Shelves: May 10, Rt rated it it was amazing. Free review copy. Jane Ward, Not Gay: Sex Between Straight White Men: Straight white men also use white privilege to define their sexual contact with other men as not gay.

One white Mississippi politician survived a few such revelations until he was arrested for giving a blowjob to a black man. It was one thing to want his own erection taken care of by any means available, and quite another to be penetrated. Ward also analogizes sexual contact between heterosexual men to sexual contact between children, which is often characterized as not really sex. Descriptions of both often use the same words: She also offers a fascinating example of white solidarity, where a police officer breaks ranks to protect a white man, even one seeking sex with men, from the threat of blackness.

Tearoom participants often professed to love their wives, but to be getting insufficient sex from them, and tearooms were quick, inexpensive, non-entangling, and better than masturbation. Ward also analyzes portrayals of accidental homosexuality in popular media, usually played as humorous. Dude-sex is for straight guys who are strong and relaxed enough to handle it. Mostly they use the language of service: Another chapter explores the gay porn site HazeHim.

Though there are signifiers of fiction, such as the presence of lighting apparatus and recognizable gay porn stars, the key here is that the performers know how to perform not-gay homosexual sex, with repeated reference to force and to earning a place in the fraternity. This leads to a culture of sexualized violence and violent sexuality, where gay men often felt pressure from straight men to have sex. Given the amount of homosexual contact involved in heterosexuality, Ward concludes, we need to push back against purely biological accounts and accept the possibility of male sexual fluidity.

Get A Copy

Apr 15, Charlotte rated it really liked it. I received this book from NetGalley. Ward's book is a valuable contribution to the field of sexuality studies, and one that certainly caused quite a bit of thought on my part. She questions some ideas that are currently taken as fact, such as sexuality being immutable and as something we're "born with" rather than as a choice, or the idea of coming out as gay as not also aligning oneself with a political and cultural movement.

Ward's premise is essentially this: In the case of white straight men, Ward denotes that certain parts of homosexuality are considered an essential part of this particular genre of heterosexuality - emboldening the masculinity and str8ness of the participants. She focuses primarily on this bro culture, the playfulness of frat culture, of hazing. She is careful to discuss aspects of assault here, as well, but also note that especially in college settings, or craigslist casual encounters, that there's a certain seeking of bro for bro that seems to only strengthen their sameness.

I'm iffy about bi-erasure in this - by saying that a sexual fluidity is just part of a straight identity, is Ward supporting internalized homophobia? At the same time, should any of us be defining what is "straight," "gay," and who should be part of that? Is it harmful to sort people into narrow categories like that, compared to saying that all sexuality is fluid and crosses borders?

I think there's a lot to digest in this book that is novel and thought-provoking. I think some could potentially be harmful to queer studies, but overall I would say this is a worthwhile book. I like a book that allows me to argue with it, and that does not simply echo my own thoughts, but makes me really think about our world and how we define it.

I'll end with something Ward says in the conclusion that sums up a portion of her book: Men of color, on the other hand, quickly fall subject to misrecognized and hypersurveilled categories like 'the down low. Instead, I have suggested that we extend to all men, both white men and men of color, the possibility that male sexualities are as fluid as female sexualities - and that all sexualities are shaped by a complex nexus of structural, cultural, and psychic forces.

Aug 10, Drianne rated it liked it Shelves: There were some very interesting ideas in here, and I'd really like to read the author's book she seemed to be contemplating about social constructions of and personal shapings of sexual orientation this was only partially that book. However, the book here was repetitive -- right down to actual sentences from the introductory chapter being word-for-word echoed in the later chapters. I also wasn't super-impressed with all of her analyses and despite her protests there did seem to be some bi-era There were some very interesting ideas in here, and I'd really like to read the author's book she seemed to be contemplating about social constructions of and personal shapings of sexual orientation this was only partially that book.

I also wasn't super-impressed with all of her analyses and despite her protests there did seem to be some bi-erasure going on. Still, very interesting.

• gay personal dating sites?
• ‘Green Book’ Review: A Road Trip Through a Land of Racial Clichés.
• escort gay male chicago?
• Site Index.
• gay white videos - test.konfer.eu.
• 22 tweets that explain what a “white gay” is and how you can avoid being one / Queerty.
• gay social network app?

Dec 18, Matt Holsapple rated it did not like it Shelves: As a pseudo-academic, I read this and think "This is why we can't have nice things. Wordy as fuck but super super interesting and irresistibly quotable. Lots to think about. I made my Kindle notes visible. I put straight in quotations because is anyone ever truly straight? But, in all seriousness, I did learn quite a bit from this book. More of applying what I already knew of straight men and actually examining the history, sociology, culture, and psychology of it was endlessly fascinating to me. I'm a huge history buff, plus I'm a psych major who also loves anthropology and sociol 3.

I'm a huge history buff, plus I'm a psych major who also loves anthropology and sociology, I was in heaven with this book. Of course, I didn't agree with everything, specifically on certain points in the sections when she stated that white men were scared of non-white men, more angled towards black men. I'd be more scared if a group of white men were coming towards me, honestly.

• queer vs. gay?
• Results for : gay white.
• gay dating sites uk?
• free phone dating men gay?
• .

My favorite sections of this book were the history of heterosexuality. It was amazing to learn about how the term came around and what it originally meant, then how it was twisted into being this thing everyone should be. I'm pretty sure the Id was the thesis, Ego the antithesis, and Superego was the synthesis, but I'd have to look it up. The other section I truly enjoyed was the chapter devoted to Craigslist ads in the Casual Encounters section. Analyzing the text and cultural appropriation done by presumably white men was very interesting to read. I did recommend this to my friend.

Something I wasn't a fan of was the last chapter. It felt out of place and more of being tacked on to acknowledge the author's queerness. Unneeded, for the most part. I skimmed it since by that part I knew where it was heading, so I didn't feel I needed it since the rest of the book was so solid. Then, in the beginning, there was a lot of focus on her. Earlier this summer I read an ARC where the author focused on herself and her experiences more than the subject of the book, so I was a bit annoyed when it started and was very pleased when it ended.